7/25/07 14:35:18
facility 664 (facn 1431350064) has source P003 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 654 (facn 1431140861) has source Z025 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 655 (facn 1431150060) has source B001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 655 (facn 1431150060) has source B010 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 655 (facn 1431150060) has source B024 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 655 (facn 1431150060) has source F016 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 655 (facn 1431150060) has source P016 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 633 (facn 1431010054) has source N001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 672 (facn 1431390137) has source P005 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 653 (facn 1431092049) has source P008 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 653 (facn 1431092049) has source Z999 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 663 (facn 1431340977) has source X000 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 673 (facn 1431390903) has source B021 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 673 (facn 1431390903) has source P107 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 619 (facn 1409040014) has source B011 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 497 (facn 0812760220) has source Z001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 521 (facn 0857040734) has source B004 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 518 (facn 0857040017) has source B002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 518 (facn 0857040017) has source B003 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 540 (facn 0857810015) has source B002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 540 (facn 0857810015) has source B006 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 520 (facn 0857040180) has source X001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 526 (facn 0857041333) has source B003 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 514 (facn 0855140083) has source B002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 514 (facn 0855140083) has source B003 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 514 (facn 0855140083) has source B004 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 514 (facn 0855140083) has source K002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 514 (facn 0855140083) has source Z001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 514 (facn 0855140083) has source Z002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 521 (facn 0857040734) has source P091 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 521 (facn 0857040734) has source P092 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 521 (facn 0857040734) has source P094 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 532 (facn 0857101741) has source K002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 518 (facn 0857040017) has source B002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 518 (facn 0857040017) has source B003 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 534 (facn 0857170125) has source P025 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 529 (facn 0857080148) has source K005 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 529 (facn 0857080148) has source K020 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 540 (facn 0857810015) has source B001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 540 (facn 0857810015) has source B002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 540 (facn 0857810015) has source B006 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 530 (facn 0857090718) has source K050 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 526 (facn 0857041333) has source B003 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 51 (facn 0149000088) has source P023 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 541 (facn 0868030155) has source P021 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 541 (facn 0868030155) has source P024 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 508 (facn 0829700441) has source Z706 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 497 (facn 0812760220) has source K036 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 497 (facn 0812760220) has source Z001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 684 (facn 1483090101) has source R004 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 684 (facn 1483090101) has source R008 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 684 (facn 1483090101) has source R013 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 684 (facn 1483090101) has source R015 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 684 (facn 1483090101) has source R016 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 684 (facn 1483090101) has source R020 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 685 (facn 1483090334) has source P001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 667 (facn 1431370116) has source K001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 667 (facn 1431370116) has source K003 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 650 (facn 1431073342) has source K011 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 650 (facn 1431073342) has source K012 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 636 (facn 1431070035) has source P059 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 636 (facn 1431070035) has source P100 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 636 (facn 1431070035) has source P101 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 636 (facn 1431070035) has source P102 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 636 (facn 1431070035) has source P103 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 635 (facn 1431053380) has source R001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 654 (facn 1431140861) has source Z025 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 654 (facn 1431140861) has source Z027 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 656 (facn 1431150801) has source Z073 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 633 (facn 1431010054) has source N001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 633 (facn 1431010054) has source P044 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 633 (facn 1431010054) has source P045 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 633 (facn 1431010054) has source P046 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 633 (facn 1431010054) has source T052 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 633 (facn 1431010054) has source T053 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 672 (facn 1431390137) has source P005 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 653 (facn 1431092049) has source P008 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 653 (facn 1431092049) has source Z999 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 663 (facn 1431340977) has source X000 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 669 (facn 1431370758) has source K001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 673 (facn 1431390903) has source B021 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 673 (facn 1431390903) has source P107 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 673 (facn 1431390903) has source P136 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 673 (facn 1431390903) has source P145 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 627 (facn 1413000187) has source Z026 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 619 (facn 1409040014) has source B011 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 619 (facn 1409040014) has source Z002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 618 (facn 1409030092) has source K001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 618 (facn 1409030092) has source Z002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 622 (facn 1409040801) has source P001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 622 (facn 1409040801) has source P002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 622 (facn 1409040801) has source P003 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 252 (facn 0332010003) has source P009 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 252 (facn 0332010003) has source P010 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 252 (facn 0332010003) has source R001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 312 (facn 0381000011) has source X400 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 203 (facn 0302020015) has source P077 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 22 (facn 0125040296) has source P004 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 118 (facn 0243160086) has source P001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 133 (facn 0247080049) has source P001 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 360 (facn 0448010246) has source B046 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 360 (facn 0448010246) has source B047 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 360 (facn 0448010246) has source Z008 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 360 (facn 0448010246) has source B013 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 360 (facn 0448010246) has source B002 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
facility 360 (facn 0448010246) has source B004 associated with it 0 times -- is not right.
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
1431390903B022 !! (record 59) skipped. (records 59 and 538 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P104 !! (record 61) skipped. (records 61 and 539 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P105 !! (record 62) skipped. (records 62 and 540 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P106 !! (record 63) skipped. (records 63 and 541 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903B043 !! (record 60) skipped. (records 60 and 542 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B003 !! (record 53) skipped. (records 53 and 543 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B005 !! (record 55) skipped. (records 55 and 544 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B001 !! (record 52) skipped. (records 52 and 545 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B004 !! (record 54) skipped. (records 54 and 546 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
1431390903B022 !! (record 59) skipped. (records 59 and 538 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P104 !! (record 61) skipped. (records 61 and 539 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P105 !! (record 62) skipped. (records 62 and 540 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P106 !! (record 63) skipped. (records 63 and 541 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903B043 !! (record 60) skipped. (records 60 and 542 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B003 !! (record 53) skipped. (records 53 and 543 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B005 !! (record 55) skipped. (records 55 and 544 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B001 !! (record 52) skipped. (records 52 and 545 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B004 !! (record 54) skipped. (records 54 and 546 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
1431390903B022 !! (record 59) skipped. (records 59 and 538 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P104 !! (record 61) skipped. (records 61 and 539 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P105 !! (record 62) skipped. (records 62 and 540 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P106 !! (record 63) skipped. (records 63 and 541 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903B043 !! (record 60) skipped. (records 60 and 542 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B003 !! (record 53) skipped. (records 53 and 543 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B005 !! (record 55) skipped. (records 55 and 544 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B001 !! (record 52) skipped. (records 52 and 545 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B004 !! (record 54) skipped. (records 54 and 546 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
1431390903B022 !! (record 59) skipped. (records 59 and 538 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P104 !! (record 61) skipped. (records 61 and 539 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P105 !! (record 62) skipped. (records 62 and 540 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P106 !! (record 63) skipped. (records 63 and 541 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903B043 !! (record 60) skipped. (records 60 and 542 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B003 !! (record 53) skipped. (records 53 and 543 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B005 !! (record 55) skipped. (records 55 and 544 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B001 !! (record 52) skipped. (records 52 and 545 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B004 !! (record 54) skipped. (records 54 and 546 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
1431390903B022 !! (record 59) skipped. (records 59 and 538 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P104 !! (record 61) skipped. (records 61 and 539 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P105 !! (record 62) skipped. (records 62 and 540 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P106 !! (record 63) skipped. (records 63 and 541 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903B043 !! (record 60) skipped. (records 60 and 542 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B003 !! (record 53) skipped. (records 53 and 543 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B005 !! (record 55) skipped. (records 55 and 544 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B001 !! (record 52) skipped. (records 52 and 545 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B004 !! (record 54) skipped. (records 54 and 546 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
1431390903B022 !! (record 59) skipped. (records 59 and 538 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P104 !! (record 61) skipped. (records 61 and 539 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P105 !! (record 62) skipped. (records 62 and 540 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P106 !! (record 63) skipped. (records 63 and 541 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903B043 !! (record 60) skipped. (records 60 and 542 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B003 !! (record 53) skipped. (records 53 and 543 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B005 !! (record 55) skipped. (records 55 and 544 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B001 !! (record 52) skipped. (records 52 and 545 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B004 !! (record 54) skipped. (records 54 and 546 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
1431390903B022 !! (record 59) skipped. (records 59 and 538 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P104 !! (record 61) skipped. (records 61 and 539 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P105 !! (record 62) skipped. (records 62 and 540 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P106 !! (record 63) skipped. (records 63 and 541 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903B043 !! (record 60) skipped. (records 60 and 542 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B003 !! (record 53) skipped. (records 53 and 543 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B005 !! (record 55) skipped. (records 55 and 544 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B001 !! (record 52) skipped. (records 52 and 545 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B004 !! (record 54) skipped. (records 54 and 546 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
1409010006P908 !! (record 67) skipped. (records 67 and 526 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1409000003B001 !! (record 72) skipped. (records 72 and 527 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
1431390903B022 !! (record 59) skipped. (records 59 and 538 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P104 !! (record 61) skipped. (records 61 and 539 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P105 !! (record 62) skipped. (records 62 and 540 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903P106 !! (record 63) skipped. (records 63 and 541 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431390903B043 !! (record 60) skipped. (records 60 and 542 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B003 !! (record 53) skipped. (records 53 and 543 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B005 !! (record 55) skipped. (records 55 and 544 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B001 !! (record 52) skipped. (records 52 and 545 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
1431070076B004 !! (record 54) skipped. (records 54 and 546 are both are for NOX -- not good.)
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1, 9)= 2125.17; podum(1)= 866.13
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2, 9)= 689.48; podum(2)= 346.35
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,31)= 4374.09; podum(1)= 1553.94
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,31)= 903.92; podum(2)= 597.64
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,57)= 957.45; podum(1)= 479.82
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,57)= 127.67; podum(2)= 115.75
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,12)= 10.18; podum(1)= 5.09
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,12)= 119.87; podum(2)= 60.91
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,57)= 957.45; podum(1)= 479.82
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,57)= 127.67; podum(2)= 115.75
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,29)= 2.00; podum(1)= 1.00
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,29)= 1.82; podum(2)= 1.71
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,31)= 4374.09; podum(1)= 1553.94
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,31)= 903.92; podum(2)= 597.64
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,29)= 2.00; podum(1)= 1.00
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,29)= 1.82; podum(2)= 1.71
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,29)= 2.00; podum(1)= 1.00
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,29)= 1.82; podum(2)= 1.71
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,12)= 10.18; podum(1)= 5.09
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,12)= 119.87; podum(2)= 60.91
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,57)= 957.45; podum(1)= 479.82
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,57)= 127.67; podum(2)= 115.75
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,31)= 4374.09; podum(1)= 1553.94
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,31)= 903.92; podum(2)= 597.64
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1, 9)= 2125.17; podum(1)= 866.13
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2, 9)= 689.48; podum(2)= 346.35
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,12)= 10.18; podum(1)= 5.09
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,12)= 119.87; podum(2)= 60.91
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,29)= 2.00; podum(1)= 1.00
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,29)= 1.82; podum(2)= 1.71
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,12)= 10.18; podum(1)= 5.09
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,12)= 119.87; podum(2)= 60.91
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,29)= 2.00; podum(1)= 1.00
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,29)= 1.82; podum(2)= 1.71
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,57)= 957.45; podum(1)= 479.82
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,57)= 127.67; podum(2)= 115.75
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,57)= 957.45; podum(1)= 479.82
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,57)= 127.67; podum(2)= 115.75
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,12)= 10.18; podum(1)= 5.09
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,12)= 119.87; podum(2)= 60.91
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,29)= 2.00; podum(1)= 1.00
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,29)= 1.82; podum(2)= 1.71
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1, 9)= 2125.17; podum(1)= 866.13
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2, 9)= 689.48; podum(2)= 346.35
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409010006 P908?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1409000003 B001?
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1, 9)= 2125.17; podum(1)= 866.13
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2, 9)= 689.48; podum(2)= 346.35
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B022?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P104?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P105?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 P106?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431390903 B043?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B003?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B005?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B001?
Hey! (exclaims eqsel); how can there be more than one NOX record for 1431070076 B004?
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,31)= 4374.09; podum(1)= 1553.94
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,31)= 903.92; podum(2)= 597.64
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,29)= 2.00; podum(1)= 1.00
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,29)= 1.82; podum(2)= 1.71
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(1,57)= 957.45; podum(1)= 479.82
!! Hey! messup in the poco/podum logic in aobcpm. These numbers should match: poco(2,57)= 127.67; podum(2)= 115.75
Here is a summary of the 20 files retrieved by a ls -l -rt robyn/*.txt directory listing:
| file | records | pollutant |
| 1 | Inclusion.txt | -1 | |
| 2 | robyn/Cincinnati_Hamilton_NOx.txt | 64 | NOX |
| 3 | robyn/Cincinnati_Butler_NOx.txt | 13 | NOX |
| 4 | robyn/Dayton_Greene_NOx.txt | 1 | NOX |
| 5 | robyn/Dayton_Clark_NOx.txt | 9 | NOX |
| 6 | robyn/Dayton_Montgomery_NOx.txt | 24 | NOX |
| 7 | robyn/Dayton_Miami_NOx.txt | 10 | NOX |
| 8 | robyn/Dayton_Montgomery_VOC.txt | 110 | VOC |
| 9 | robyn/Dayton_Fayette_VOC.txt | 11 | VOC |
| 10 | robyn/Dayton_Madison_VOC.txt | 5 | VOC |
| 11 | robyn/Dayton_Preble_VOC.txt | 15 | VOC |
| 12 | robyn/Dayton_Greene_VOC.txt | 4 | VOC |
| 13 | robyn/Dayton_Clark_VOC.txt | 9 | VOC |
| 14 | data.txt | -1 | |
| 15 | robyn/Cincinati_Warren_VOC.txt | 14 | VOC |
| 16 | robyn/Cincinati_Hamilton_VOC.txt | 139 | VOC |
| 17 | robyn/Cincinati_Clermont_VOC.txt | 8 | VOC |
| 18 | robyn/Cincinati_Butler_VOC.txt | 37 | VOC |
| 19 | robyn/VOCbank_bak.txt | 39 | VOC |
| 20 | robyn/NOxbank_bak.txt | 69 | NOX |
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
-- Tacitus